Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2582
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTanle, Augustine-
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-30T12:40:39Z-
dc.date.available2016-05-30T12:40:39Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2582-
dc.description.abstractAlthough migration is often perceived as a livelihood strategy for both poor and non-poor households in developing countries such as Ghana, most livelihood frameworks overlook the links between migration and livelihoods. The author therefore reviews literature on livelihood approaches and compares the differences between some livelihood frameworks. The findings show that although all of the studied livelihood frameworks focus on sustainable development they differ in terms of their core mandates, which range from integrated rural development through the environment to sustainable human development. The contexts in which livelihoods are practised are influenced by institutional structures, processes and elements of vulnerability, which could be both internal and external. In conclusion, the author proposes an integrated framework for analysing the links between migration (both internal and international) and livelihood which have been glossed over in the literature.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectGhanaen_US
dc.subjectMigrationen_US
dc.subjectIntegrated frameworken_US
dc.subjectLivelihooden_US
dc.subjectFrameworken_US
dc.titleTowards an integrated framework for analysing the links between migration and livelihoodsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Population & Health

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Tanle 2015.pdfArticle616.27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.