Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4294
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKwadzo, Moses-
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-11T09:21:03Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-11T09:21:03Z-
dc.date.issued2015-07-09-
dc.identifier.issn23105496-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4294-
dc.description16p:, ill.en_US
dc.description.abstractA comparative analysis of different poverty measures, particularly across studies that use different conceptualizations and measurements of poverty, is very valuable. In highlighting this fact, this article compares three poverty measurements: monetary poverty, social exclusion, and capability poverty measurements. The results indicate that all three poverty measurements classify varied proportions of the U.S. population as poor. These variations occur as a function of the conceptualization and measurement of poverty. In general, all three poverty measurements are inadequate indicators of well-being. It is reasonable to suggest that researchers report results using more than one poverty measurementen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Cape Coasten_US
dc.subjectSocial exclusion povertyen_US
dc.subjectMonetary povertyen_US
dc.subjectCapability povertyen_US
dc.subjectMeasurement of povertyen_US
dc.subjectConceptualization of povertyen_US
dc.titleChoosing concepts and measurements of poverty: a comparison of three major poverty approachesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Agricultural Economics & Extension

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Choosing Concepts and Measurements of Poverty A Comparison of Three Major Poverty Approaches.pdfArticle401.87 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.