Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4356
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAcquah, Henry De-Graft-
dc.contributor.authorOnumah, Edward Ebo-
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-15T14:35:50Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-15T14:35:50Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.issn23105496-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4356-
dc.description5p:, ill.en_US
dc.description.abstractA conventional approach to analysing asymmetric price transmission involves the use of the Houck’s static model. This paper compares this time invariant approach to a dynamic variant of the model. The static model is a standard regression type model where parameters are assumed fixed over time, whereas the more flexible dynamic Houck’s model allows parameters to vary over time. The flexibility of the dynamic modelling revealed the existence of price asymmetry in the Ghanaian maize market. This result was not supported by the Houck’s static model. The results suggest that within the price transmission modelling framework, static and dynamic variants of the same approach may lead to differences in conclusionen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Cape Coasten_US
dc.subjectAsymmetryen_US
dc.subjectModel choiceen_US
dc.subjectStaticen_US
dc.subjectDynamicen_US
dc.titleStatic versus dynamic model for estimating asymmetric price transmission in the Ghanaian maize marketen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Agricultural Economics & Extension

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Static versus dynamic model for estimating asymmetric.pdfArticle95.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.