Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4732
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCarson, A.G.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-23T13:46:33Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-23T13:46:33Z-
dc.date.issued2016-06-
dc.identifier.issn23105496-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4732-
dc.description6p:, ill.en_US
dc.description.abstractProduction of the early varieties of pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) K. Schum.) is increasing because of their earliness and drought tolerance in the face of a shortening and decreasing rainy season. Weeds were considered as a major constraint on improving yields. To improve weed management in millet, the major weeds have been identified in on-farm surveys as a pre-requisite to identifying appropriate weed control recommendations. Grain yield losses incurred by farmers' weeding practices were found to range from 27 to 36%. Early control of weeds within-the-rows, either by handhoeing or by band application of low rates of atrazine or propazine, increased yields by more than 50% in 1985 and by more than 30% in 1986 over farmers' practice. The band herbicide treatment was, however, more cost-effective and easier-to-accomplish than handweeding of weeds within-the-rowsen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Cape Coasten_US
dc.subjectSurvey of annual weeds in pearl milleten_US
dc.subjectEstimation crop lossesen_US
dc.subjectYield advantage in early control of weeds within-the-row.en_US
dc.titleImproving weed management in the draft animal‐based production of early pearl millet in the Gambiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Crop Science

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Improving weed management in the draft.pdfArticle616.45 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.