Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/5095
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ampofo, E. A. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-03-22T17:32:25Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-03-22T17:32:25Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010-02 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 23105496 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/5095 | - |
dc.description | 10p:, ill. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Soil moisture is important for crop cultivation and its adequacy to meet crop-water requirements is determined by the degree of soil management practiced and the quantity of water applied to the soil. This study investigates soil moisture dynamics on three plots: Bare (clean, weeds removed), Weedy (kept weedy), and Mulched (cleared of weeds and fully covered with grass mulch) during rainy and dry periods at the Teaching and Research Farm at the University of Cape Coast, in the coastal savanna zone of Ghana. Soil moisture dynamics under different levels of soil compaction were also studied. A Massey Ferguson tractor (MF265) was used to compact the soil at various levels by making 0, 1, 5, 9 and 13 passes. During both the rainy and the dry periods, moisture retention in the soil under bare, weedy and mulched plots increased with depth. During the rainy period, the mean soil moisture retention was in the order: Mulched > Weedy > Bare at both 0–20 cm and 20–40 cm depths. Within a 7-day period, soil moisture measurements from a day after heavy rainfall (intensity > 7 mm h-1) gave mean moisture losses of 2.7, 4.1 and 3.9% for the Bare, Weedy and Mulched plots, respectively. During the dry period, however, the mean soil moisture retention was of the order: Mulched > Bare > Weedy at both 0–20 cm and 20–40 cm depths. Mean moisture loss during a 7-day dry period was 4.5, 2.9 and 3.4% for the Bare, Weedy and Mulched plots, respectively. Under different levels of soil compaction, the mean moisture retention in the soil increased from 8.3% at 0 pass to 17.8% at 13 passes within the 0–20 cm depth, whilst it decreased from 13.3 to 5.9% from 0 to 13 passes, respectively, within the 20–40 cm depth. It was realized that at less than two passes, the mean soil moisture retention within the 0–20 cm depth was less than the mean moisture retention within the 20–40 cm depth, but the converse happened for more than two passes. The study showed that mulching the soil surface helped to retain enough soil moisture during both the rainy and the dry seasons. Also, soil with high sand content required some sort of soil compaction in order to retain enough moisture at the crop rooting zone | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of Cape Coast | en_US |
dc.subject | Coastal Savanna | en_US |
dc.subject | Crop-water | en_US |
dc.subject | Mulch | en_US |
dc.subject | Rooting zone | en_US |
dc.subject | Soil compaction | en_US |
dc.subject | Soil management | en_US |
dc.subject | Soil moisture dynamics | en_US |
dc.title | Soil moisture dynamics in coastal savanna soils in the tropics under different soil management practices | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Department of Soil Science |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Soil moisture dynamics in coastal savanna soils in the tropics under different soil management practices.pdf | Article | 564.77 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.