Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/5243
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEkumah, Bernard-
dc.contributor.authorArmah, Frederick Ato-
dc.contributor.authorYawson, David Oscar-
dc.contributor.authorQuansah, Reginald-
dc.contributor.authorNyieku, Florence Esi-
dc.contributor.authorOwusu, Samuel Asiedu-
dc.contributor.authorOdoi, Justice Odoiquaye-
dc.contributor.authorAfitiri, Abdul-Rahaman-
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-06T13:41:03Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-06T13:41:03Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn23105496-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/5243-
dc.description12p:, ill.en_US
dc.description.abstractCOVID-19 is an active pandemic that likely poses an existential threat to humanity. Frequent handwashing, social distancing, and partial or total lockdowns are among the suite of measures prescribed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and being implemented across the world to contain the pandemic. However, existing inequalities in access to certain basic necessities of life (water, sanitation facility, and food storage) create layered vulnerabilities to COVID-19 and can render the preventive measures ineffective or simply counterproductive. We hypothesized that individuals in households without any of the named basic necessities of life are more likely to violate the preventive (especially lockdown) measures and thereby increase the risk of infection or aid the spread of COVID-19. Based on nationally-representative data for 25 sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries, multivariate statistical and geospatial analyses were used to investigate whether, and to what extent, household family structure is associated with in-house access to basic needs which, in turn, could reflect on a higher risk of COVID- 19 infection. The results indicate that approximately 46% of the sampled households in these countries (except South Africa) did not have in-house access to any of the three basic needs and about 8% had access to all the three basic needs. Five countries had less than 2% of their households with in-house access to all three basic needs. Ten countries had over 50% of their households with no in-house access to all the three basic needs. There is a social gradient in in-house access between the rich and the poor, urban and rural richest, male- and femaleheaded households, among others. We conclude that SSA governments would need to infuse innovative genderand age-sensitive support services (such as water supply, portable sanitation) to augment the preventive measures prescribed by the WHO. Short-, medium- and long-term interventions within and across countries should necessarily address the upstream, midstream and downstream determinants of in-house access and the full spectrum of layers of inequalities including individual, interpersonal, institutional, and population levelsen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Cape Coasten_US
dc.subjectPandemicen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19 responseen_US
dc.subjectWater and sanitationen_US
dc.subjectFood accessen_US
dc.subjectInfectious diseaseen_US
dc.subjectPreventive measureen_US
dc.subjectublic healthen_US
dc.titleDisparate on-site access to water, sanitation, and food storage heighten the risk of COVID-19 spread in Sub-Saharan Africaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Agricultural Economics & Extension

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Disparate on-site access to water, sanitation, and food storage heighten the.pdfArticle3.82 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.