Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/6411
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCoker, Wincharles-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-10T10:53:11Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-10T10:53:11Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn23105496-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/6411-
dc.description14p:, ill.en_US
dc.description.abstractThough rhetorical scholars have argued that scientific inquiry does not lack human agency, our knowledge of how agency is enacted in scientific texts is blurred. Using abstracts from the American Journal of Bioethics, this paper argues and demonstrates how our understanding of rhetorical agency can be enhanced through the neglected theory of tagmemics. Intended as a heuristic, the paper argues that contributors to the American Journal of Bioethics are capable of constructing individual responsible agency that is in tandem with rhetorical choices they make within their community of consensusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Cape Coasten_US
dc.subjectRhetoricen_US
dc.subjectAgencyen_US
dc.subjectScientific communicationen_US
dc.subjectBioethicsen_US
dc.subjectTagmemicsen_US
dc.titleThe question of rhetorical agency in scientific communication: A case studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Communication Studies

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
The question of rhetorical agency in scientific communication.pdfArticle301.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.