Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/6411
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Coker, Wincharles | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-10T10:53:11Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-10T10:53:11Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 23105496 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/6411 | - |
dc.description | 14p:, ill. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Though rhetorical scholars have argued that scientific inquiry does not lack human agency, our knowledge of how agency is enacted in scientific texts is blurred. Using abstracts from the American Journal of Bioethics, this paper argues and demonstrates how our understanding of rhetorical agency can be enhanced through the neglected theory of tagmemics. Intended as a heuristic, the paper argues that contributors to the American Journal of Bioethics are capable of constructing individual responsible agency that is in tandem with rhetorical choices they make within their community of consensus | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of Cape Coast | en_US |
dc.subject | Rhetoric | en_US |
dc.subject | Agency | en_US |
dc.subject | Scientific communication | en_US |
dc.subject | Bioethics | en_US |
dc.subject | Tagmemics | en_US |
dc.title | The question of rhetorical agency in scientific communication: A case study | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Department of Communication Studies |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The question of rhetorical agency in scientific communication.pdf | Article | 301.48 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.