Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/7738
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBeedie, Christopher J.-
dc.contributor.authorTerry, Peter C.-
dc.contributor.authorLane, Andrew M.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-08T10:03:26Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-08T10:03:26Z-
dc.date.issued2015-06-
dc.identifier.issn23105496-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/7738-
dc.description22p:, ill.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe present study comprised two meta-analyses of published studies that used the Profile of Mood States (POMS) to investigate relationships between mood and athletic achievement (n = 13) and between mood and performance outcome (n = 16). Results showed that effect sizes (ESs) for the level of achievement metaanalysis were minimal (Weighted Meun ES = .lo, SD = .07), a finding consistent with a previous meta-analysis by Rowley, Landers, Kyllo, and Etnier (1995). Larger effects were found for the performance outcome meta-analysis (Weighted Mean ES = .31, SD = .12). Effects were moderate for vigor, confusion, and depression, small for anger and tension, and very small for fatigue. All effects were in the direction predicted by Morgan’s (1985) Mental Health Model. Effects were larger in sports of short duration, in sports involving open skills, and where performance was judged using self-referenced criteria. Findings suggest that the POMS has utility in the prediction of performance outcome but not in the prediction of level of achievement.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Cape Coasten_US
dc.titleThe Profile of Mood States and Athletic Performance: Two Meta-analysesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Health, Physical Education & Recreation

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mood state changes in collegiate track and field athletes.pdfArticle1.31 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.