Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/7765
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMintah, Joseph Kwame-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-08T17:01:51Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-08T17:01:51Z-
dc.date.issued2013-01-
dc.identifier.issn23105496-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/7765-
dc.description3p:, ill.en_US
dc.description.abstractCompetitive athletes attribute their successes and failures to factors such as ability, effort, task difficulty, and luck. Research shows that the type of attribution athletes use to define outcomes affects both motivation and performance: It is therefore important for coaches to fully understand the attribution process. Heider <1944) categorized behavioral outcomes into effective personal force (ability and effort> and effective environmental force <task difficulty and luck>. Based on his theory the four attributions of ability, effort, task difficulty, and luck influence future success and failure. In 1972, Weiner restructured Heider's four attributions into a two-dimensional framework he called locus of causality. Locus of causality has two components: stability and locus of control.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Cape Coasten_US
dc.titleWhat Coaches Can Learn from Athlete Perceptionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Department of Health, Physical Education & Recreation

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
What Coaches Can Learn from Athlete Perceptions.pdfArticle3.54 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.