Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/9165
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ward, Claire Leonie | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shaw, David | - |
dc.contributor.author | Anane-Sarpong, Evelyn | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sankoh, Osman | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tanner, Marcel | - |
dc.contributor.author | Elger, Bernice | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-09T19:13:53Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-09T19:13:53Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/9165 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: The study uses a qualitative empirical method to define Health Research for Development. This project explores the perspectives of stakeholders in an international health research partnership operating in Ghana and Tanzania. Methods: We conducted 52 key informant interviews with major stakeholders in an international multicenter partnership between GlaxoSmithKline (GSK, Vaccine Developer) and the global health nonprofit organisation PATH and its Malaria Vaccine Initiativeprogram(PATH/MVI,Funder-DevelopmentPartner),(RTS,S)(NCT00866619). The respondents included teams from four clinical research centres (two centres in Ghana and two in Tanzania) and various collaborating partners. This paper analyses responses to the question: What is Health Research for Development? Results: Based on the stakeholders’ experience the respondents offered many ways of defining Health Research for Development. The responses fell into four broad themes: i) Equitable Partnerships; ii) System Sustainability; iii) Addressing Local Health Targets, and iv) Regional Commitment to Benefit Sharing. Conclusion: Through defining Health Research for Development six key learning points were generated from the four result themes: 1) Ensure there is local research leadership working with the collaborative partnership, and local healthcare system, to align the project agenda and activities with local research and health priorities; 2) Know the country-specific context - map the social, health, legislative and political setting; 3) Define an explicit development component and plan of action in a research project; 4) Address the barriers and opportunities to sustain system capacity. 5) Support decentralised health system decision-making to facilitate the translation pathway; 6) Govern, monitor and evaluate the development components of health research partnerships. Overall, equity and unity between partners are required to deliver health research for development. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Developing World Bioethics | en_US |
dc.subject | Collaboration, Development, Empirical, Equity, Health Research | en_US |
dc.title | Defining Health Research for Development: The perspective of stakeholders from an international health research partnership in Ghana and Tanzania | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | School of Medical Sciences |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Defining Health Research for Development The perspective of.pdf | MAIN ARTICLE | 491.87 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.