Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/9294
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNudzor, Hope Pius-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-11T16:05:09Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-11T16:05:09Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/9294-
dc.description.abstractA review of education policy and practice indicates a paradox in policy implementation. Policy outcomes most often differ significantly from intended purposes and provisions enacted. This paper re-conceptualises this policy phenomenon, drawing on the post-modernist conception of policy as both ‘text’ and ‘discourse’ as an approach for understanding and unmasking the messiness and contested nature of education policy processes. The choice of approach is based on three factors. First, the choice is grounded in its efficacy in explicating and legitimatising the issues of power within the policy arena. Second, the choice is based on the potential of the approach in integrating social and political theories of discourse with more linguistically oriented approaches to the study of policy. Third, the preference of approach follows from its potential to draw on language as a resource for reading into and/or analysing complex social issues.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDiscourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Educationen_US
dc.subjectpolicy as ‘text’en_US
dc.subjectpost-modernen_US
dc.subjectchange managementen_US
dc.subjectpolicy paradoxen_US
dc.subjectpolicy as ‘texten_US
dc.titleRe-conceptualising the paradox in policy implementation: a post-modernist conceptual approachen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Institute for Educational Planning & Administration

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Re-conceptualising the paradox in policy implementation- a post-modernist conceptual approach.pdfMain article219.27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.