Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/9645
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAninagyei, Enoch-
dc.contributor.authorSmith‑Graham, Stella-
dc.contributor.authorBoye, Alex-
dc.contributor.authorEgyir‑Yawson, Alexander-
dc.contributor.authorAcheampong, Desmond Omane-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-18T13:13:04Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-18T13:13:04Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/9645-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Undesirable consequences of donor Plasmodium falciparum parasitaemia on stored donor blood have been reported. Therefore, it is imperative that all prospective blood donors are screened for P. falciparum infections using sensitive techniques. In this study, the sensitivities of microscopy, rapid diagnostic test (RDT), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay and selective whole genome amplification (sWGA) technique in detecting P. falciparum infections in blood donors was assessed. Methods: Randomly selected blood donors from 5 districts in Greater Accra Region of Ghana were screened for asymptomatic P. falciparum infections. Each donor sample was screened with SD Bioline RDT kit for P. falciparum his‑ tidine rich protein 2 and Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase antigens, sWGA and 18s-rRNA LAMP. Crude DNA LAMP (crDNA-LAMP) was compared to purified DNA LAMP (pDNA-LAMP). Results: A total of 771 blood donors were screened. The respective overall prevalence of P. falciparum in Ghana by microscopy, RDT, crDNA-LAMP, pDNA-LAMP and sWGA was 7.4%, 11.8%, 16.9%, 17.5% and 18.0%. Using sWGA as the reference test, the sensitivities of microscopy, RDT, crDNA-LAMP and pDNA-LAMP were 41.0% (95% CI 32.7–49.7), 65.5% (95% CI 56.9–73.3), 82.6% (95% CI 75.8–88.3) and 95.7% (95% CI 90.1–98.4), respectively. There was near perfect agreement between LAMP and sWGA (sWGA vs. crDNA-LAMP, κ = 0.87; sWGA vs. pDNA-LAMP, κ = 0.96), while crDNA- LAMP and pDNA-LAMP agreed perfectly (κ = 0.91). Goodness of fit test indicated non-significant difference between the performance of LAMP and sWGA (crDNA-LAMP vs. sWGA: x2 = 0.71, p = 0.399 and pDNA-LAMP vs. sWGA: x2 = 0.14, p = 0.707). Finally, compared to sWGA, the performance of LAMP did not differ in detecting sub-microscopic parasi‑ taemia (sWGA vs. crDNA-LAMP: x2 = 1.12, p = 0.290 and sWGA vs. pDNA-LAMP: x2 = 0.22, p = 0.638). Conclusions: LAMP assay agreed near perfectly with sWGA with non-significant differences in their ability to detect asymptomatic P. falciparum parasitaemia in blood donors. Therefore, it is recommended that LAMP based assays are employed to detect P. falciparum infections in blood donors due to its high sensitivity, simplicity, cost-effectiveness and user-friendliness.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMalaria Journalen_US
dc.subject18s-rRNA-LAMPen_US
dc.subjectCrude DNA LAMP,en_US
dc.subjectPurified DNA LAMPen_US
dc.subjectSelective whole genome amplificationen_US
dc.subjectP. falciparum histidine rich proteinen_US
dc.subjectPlasmodium lactate dehydrogenaseen_US
dc.subjectDiagnostic indicesen_US
dc.subjectCrude DNA extractionen_US
dc.titleEvaluating 18s‑rRNA LAMP and selective whole genome amplification (sWGA) assay in detecting asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum infections in blood donorsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Allied Health Sciences



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.