<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/3492">
<title>Books</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/3492</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/3765"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-04-14T23:27:46Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/3765">
<title>Estimation of soil losses within plots as affected by different agricultural land management</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/3765</link>
<description>Estimation of soil losses within plots as affected by different agricultural land management
Ampofo, E.A; Muni, R.K; Bonsu, M
Proper agricultural land management strategies improve soil structural&#13;
properties, thereby reducing soil loss by water erosion. This study was conducted to&#13;
estimate soil losses from plots of different agricultural land management using the&#13;
Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) (95.7) model. The study took place in a&#13;
semiarid region in Kenya. The mean annual rainfall was 694 mm. The WEPP (95.7)&#13;
model was initially used to estimate total sediment loading from the catchment into a&#13;
reservoir. The estimate was about 2871 t corresponding to an average sedimentation&#13;
rate of 1063 t km"" year"', which was about 76% of the measured total sediment inflow&#13;
into the reservoir. Soil losses were estimated within 10 plots on the catchment of&#13;
different sizes and slopes with the following treatments: conventional tillage (hand&#13;
hoeing) with maize and soybean intercropping (HOCOBE); conservation tillage (disc&#13;
plough) with maize and soybean intercropping (COBEAN); conservation tillage with&#13;
only maize cultivation (CNTCORN); and conservation tillage with only soybean&#13;
cultivation (CNTBEAN). The soil loss reduction of COBEAN, CNTCORN and&#13;
CNTBEAN relative to HOCOBE ranged between 27-47%, 16-29% and 12-25%,&#13;
respectively, depending on the size and slope of the plot. In general, conservation&#13;
tillage reduced soil loss relative to conventional tillage. However, with conservation&#13;
tillage, the single cropping system resulted in greater soil loss than the intercropping&#13;
system. In the case of single cropping with conservation tillage, the soil loss reduction&#13;
for maize ranged between 4 and 9%, relative to soybean. Overall, the study showed&#13;
that there would be a significant reduction of soil losses from plots if conservation&#13;
tillage with an intercropping system (maize and soybean) were to be adopted on&#13;
agricultural lands in semiarid regions
Article
</description>
<dc:date>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
