<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>DAPQA</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4166</link>
<description>DAPQA</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 23:13:11 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-04-14T23:13:11Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>Effectiveness of National Sanitation Day as a community participatory approach for improving environmental sanitation in Edina Traditional Area, Ghana</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4175</link>
<description>Effectiveness of National Sanitation Day as a community participatory approach for improving environmental sanitation in Edina Traditional Area, Ghana
Mensah, Justice
Purpose – Poor environmental sanitation affects environmental quality and health. Ghana is a developing&#13;
country whose sanitation profile has been one of the lowest in the world in recent years. This has prompted&#13;
various views regarding effective approaches for improving sanitation in Ghana for better environmental&#13;
quality and health. The purpose of this paper is to examine the effectiveness of National Sanitation Day (NSD)&#13;
as a model for improving environmental sanitation in the Edina Traditional Area (ETA), Ghana.&#13;
Design/methodology/approach – The study used key informant interviews and focus group discussions&#13;
to collect qualitative data from purposively selected participants from predominantly fishing and farming&#13;
communities in the ETA, Ghana. Data were analysed thematically and presented using interpretive&#13;
narratives and most significant stories.&#13;
Findings – Results showed a high level of community awareness of the model but low participation in the&#13;
intervention, culminating in the model’s ineffectiveness to make any meaningful impact on improved&#13;
sanitation in the study area. Key factors responsible for the model’s ineffectiveness include apathy,&#13;
inadequate logistics, politics and attitude.&#13;
Practical implications – Government should engage more effectively with the municipal assembly, private&#13;
sanitation companies and community level authorities to address the political, logistical, attitudinal and&#13;
institutional challenges associated with the model to ensure effective participation in the NSD for better&#13;
sanitation outcomes, leading to improved environmental quality and health for sustainable development.&#13;
Originality/value – This is one of the few studies that have evaluated the effectiveness of the NSD in Ghana&#13;
since the model was introduced in the country in 2014. The outcome of the study could inform sanitation&#13;
management policy, practice and research in Ghana as well as other developing countries that may adopt or&#13;
adapt Ghana’s model.
19p, ill.
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4175</guid>
<dc:date>2019-08-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Implications of environmental sanitation  management for sustainable livelihoods in the  catchment area of Benya Lagoon in Ghana</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4171</link>
<description>Implications of environmental sanitation  management for sustainable livelihoods in the  catchment area of Benya Lagoon in Ghana
Mensah, Justice; Enu-Kwesi, Francis
The study explored the implications of environmental sanitation for&#13;
three coastal livelihood activities, namely fishing, tourism and salt&#13;
production. Qualitative data were collected from purposively&#13;
selected respondents through key informant interviews and focus&#13;
group discussions, and analysed using thematic and most significant&#13;
stories approaches. The study found that sanitation affected livelihoods&#13;
associated with tourism, fishing and salt production through&#13;
its implications for health, productivity, income, job security and&#13;
sustainability of the physical environment. However, while virtually&#13;
all respondents acknowledged the effect of sanitation on human&#13;
capital through the health implications, a substantial part of the&#13;
people who eked their living from the stated livelihood activities&#13;
did not appreciate the link between sanitation and these livelihood&#13;
avenues. Sanitation behavioural change communication messaging&#13;
by the responsible actors should, therefore, stress the relevance of&#13;
sanitation not only for human health but also the linkage between&#13;
sanitation and sustainable livelihood in its entirety.
i, 21p:, ill.
</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4171</guid>
<dc:date>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4170</link>
<description>Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review
Mensah, Justice
Sustainable development (SD) has become a popular catchphrase in&#13;
contemporary development discourse. However, in spite of its pervasiveness and&#13;
the massive popularity it has garnered over the years, the concept still seems&#13;
unclear as many people continue to ask questions about its meaning and history, as&#13;
well as what it entails and implies for development theory and practice. The purpose&#13;
of this paper is to contribute to the discourse on SD by further explaining the&#13;
paradigm and its implications for human thinking and actions in the quest for&#13;
sustainable development. This is done through extensive literature review,&#13;
combining aspects of the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and&#13;
Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Recursive Content Abstraction (RCA)&#13;
analytical approach. The paper finds and argues that the entire issue of sustainable&#13;
development centres around inter- and intragenerational equity anchored essentially&#13;
on three-dimensional distinct but interconnected pillars, namely the environment,&#13;
economy, and society. Decision-makers need to be constantly mindful of the&#13;
relationships, complementarities, and trade-offs among these pillars and ensure&#13;
responsible human behaviour and actions at the international, national, community and individual levels in order to uphold and promote the tenets of this paradigm in&#13;
the interest of human development. More needs to be done by the key players—&#13;
particularly the United Nations (UN), governments, private sector, and civil society&#13;
organisations—in terms of policies, education and regulation on social, economic&#13;
and environmental resource management to ensure that everyone is sustainable&#13;
development aware, conscious, cultured and compliant.
i, 21p:, ill.
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4170</guid>
<dc:date>2019-08-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Managing environmental sanitation in the catchment area of Benya Lagoon, Ghana: Education, regulation or infrastructure management as a matter of strategic priority?</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4169</link>
<description>Managing environmental sanitation in the catchment area of Benya Lagoon, Ghana: Education, regulation or infrastructure management as a matter of strategic priority?
Mensah, Justice
Poor environmental sanitation is a menace in many parts of the world,&#13;
but particularly so in the developing countries, including Ghana. While several&#13;
strategies may be available for managing this environmental menace, interventions&#13;
in education, regulation, and infrastructure appear to be the main options. However,&#13;
resources for adequately managing all the three dimensions simultaneously are&#13;
limited, necessitating prioritisation for efficient resource allocation for optimal&#13;
interventional results. This study explored how the dimensions could be prioritised&#13;
for efficient allocation of resources for effective sanitation management. Data were&#13;
collected from purposively selected respondents mainly from the catchment area of&#13;
Benya Lagoon in Ghana, using in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, and&#13;
analysed thematically using interpretive narratives and most significant stories. The&#13;
study showed that, theoretically, each of the dimensions was supreme in its own&#13;
right but not sufficient in itself as, in practice, they complemented one another for the best results. Most respondents prioritised the dimensions based on local-specific&#13;
factors, suggesting that there was no one-size-fits-all prioritisation strategy. The&#13;
factors were socio-economic, including income, educational level and residential&#13;
class that influenced attitudes towards sanitation. The implication is that prioritisation&#13;
decisions by the Government, NGOs, and private sanitation companies should&#13;
be guided by situational analyses which are informed by these local-specific factors.&#13;
In conducting such assessments and analyses, the local-level stakeholders, namely&#13;
the local council, traditional authorities, assembly members, youth, religious leaders&#13;
and other opinion leaders should be involved to ensure effective prioritisation&#13;
assessment, leading to efficient resource allocation for effective interventions.
i, 16p: ill.
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2019 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4169</guid>
<dc:date>2019-12-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
